Dual dating report
A relativist might argue that it is a win-win situation.
In this context, the mother would feel relief, the child would have a good home, and the social worker could adopt as desired.
These relationships can include nonsexual and legitimate interactions, many of which are unplanned and inadvertent, yet still have ethical ramifications.
Ethical issues related to professional boundaries are common and complex.
These two polarities represent deontological (categorical imperative) ethics and utilitarian (situational, or “the ends justify the means”) ethics: absolutists vs. An absolutist believes that certain actions are ethically right or wrong and that certain values should always determine the moral course of action.
A relativist believes that moral standards are personal, subjective, and situational.
Dating, bartering, and entering into business arrangements with clients represent examples of situations that are best avoided. Often they are inevitable, especially when the social worker is in private practice or practices in a rural setting or a denominational agency.The decision is measured by the goodness of the outcome for the most people.The social work stipulates that if a dual relationship is exploitative, whether it begins before, during, or after a professional relationship, it should be avoided.In a small community, same sex social activities are limited and thus may be attended by both client and worker.The incidental occurrence of boundary crossings may be unavoidable.